Skip to content

ChemKeyz aligns with the AP Chemistry Exam

The AP Chemistry exam is written by a non-profit organization called College Board. By taking the exam, students can earn college credit and demonstrate their readiness for advanced coursework in college.

AP Chemistry Updates for 2024-25

AP Chemistry Exam Concept Alignment
Concept Subconcepts Question count

Scientific Method and Measurement

Steps of the Scientific Method, Units of Measurement (SI Units), Accuracy vs. Precision, Significant Figures, Dimensional Analysis

129

Atoms, Molecules, and Ions

Structure of the Atom, Isotopes and Atomic Mass, Molecules and Molecular Compounds, Ions and Ionic Compounds, The Mole Concept

125

Phases and Classification of Matter

States of Matter, Phase Changes, Classification of Matter, Homogeneous vs. Heterogeneous Mixtures, Physical vs. Chemical Changes

138

Physical and Chemical Properties

Intensive vs. Extensive Properties, Physical Properties, Chemical Properties, Methods of Separation, Chemical vs. Physical Changes

132

Atomic Theory and Structure

Dalton’s Atomic Theory, Rutherford’s Gold Foil Experiment, Bohr Model of the Atom, Quantum Mechanical Model, Electron Configuration

135

Periodic Table and Periodicity

History of the Periodic Table, Periodic Law, Groups and Periods, Trends in Atomic Radius, Trends in Ionization Energy

126

Chemical Bonding and Molecular Structure

Ionic Bonding, Covalent Bonding, Metallic Bonding, Lewis Structures, VSEPR Theory

125

Chemical Nomenclature and Formulas

Naming Ionic Compounds, Naming Covalent Compounds, Naming Acids and Bases, Writing Chemical Formulas, Empirical and Molecular Formulas

129

Chemical Reactions and Equations

Types of Chemical Reactions, Balancing Chemical Equations, Stoichiometry, Limiting Reactants, Reaction Yield

127

Gases and Gas Laws

Properties of Gases, Boyle’s Law, Charles’s Law, Ideal Gas Law, Kinetic Molecular Theory

127

Thermodynamics and Energy

First Law of Thermodynamics, Enthalpy and Heat, Entropy and the Second Law of Thermodynamics, Gibbs Free Energy, Endothermic vs. Exothermic Reactions

130

Acids, Bases, and pH

Definitions of Acids and Bases, pH and pOH Scale, Strong vs. Weak Acids and Bases, Acid-Base Titration, Buffers and Their Function

133

Curious about how well we align with the AP Chemistry Exam? Click to expand and see the detailed breakdown of concepts and question counts.

As of July 2024, roughly 1,560 of our 1,700 questions and exercises align to concepts challenged in the AP exam, as shown by the data table.

Bloom's Taxonomy Alignment
Bloom's Taxonomy Question count
Remembering 285
Understanding 379
Applying 346
Analyzing 355
Evaluating 113
Creating 78

Expand to discover the specific learning objectives our questions address within Bloom's Taxonomy framework.

We value Bloom’s Taxonomy because it provides a structured framework for developing and assessing students’ cognitive skills at various levels. By aligning questions and exercises with Bloom’s Taxonomy, educators can ensure a comprehensive approach to learning, ultimately preparing students for higher-level academic challenges.

NGSS Alignment
Level Performance Expectation Disciplinary Core Idea (DCI) Science & Engineering Practice (SEP) Crosscutting Concept (CCC) Question count
          1,556
MS MS-PS1-1 PS1.A - Structure and Properties of Matter Developing and Using Models Scale, Proportion, and Quantity 60
MS MS-PS1-2 PS1.B - Chemical Reactions Analyzing and Interpreting Data Patterns 73
MS MS-PS1-3 PS1.A - Structure and Properties of Matter Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information Structure and Function 59
MS MS-PS1-4 PS1.A - Structure and Properties of Matter Developing and Using Models Cause and Effect 75
MS MS-PS1-5 PS1.B - Chemical Reactions Developing and Using Models Energy and Matter 74
MS MS-PS1-6 PS1.B - Chemical Reactions Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions Energy and Matter 58
MS MS-PS1-7 PS1.A - Structure and Properties of Matter Planning and Carrying Out Investigations Structure and Function 71
MS MS-PS1-8 PS1.B - Chemical Reactions Using Mathematics and Computational Thinking Patterns 59
HS HS-PS1-1 PS1.A - Structure and Properties of Matter Asking Questions and Defining Problems Patterns 62
HS HS-PS1-2 PS1.A - Structure and Properties of Matter Using Mathematics and Computational Thinking Patterns 58
HS HS-PS1-3 PS1.A - Structure and Properties of Matter Planning and Carrying Out Investigations Scale, Proportion, and Quantity 73
HS HS-PS1-4 PS1.B - Chemical Reactions Developing and Using Models Energy and Matter 64
HS HS-PS1-5 PS1.B - Chemical Reactions Developing and Using Models Energy and Matter 68
HS HS-PS1-6 PS1.C - Nuclear Processes Developing and Using Models Energy and Matter 56
HS HS-PS1-7 PS1.C - Nuclear Processes Using Mathematics and Computational Thinking Energy and Matter 56
HS HS-PS1-8 PS1.B - Chemical Reactions Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information Stability and Change 58
HS HS-PS1-9 PS1.A - Structure and Properties of Matter Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions Scale, Proportion, and Quantity 55
HS HS-PS1-10 PS1.B - Chemical Reactions Analyzing and Interpreting Data Patterns 66
HS HS-PS1-11 PS1.C - Nuclear Processes Asking Questions and Defining Problems Energy and Matter 71
HS HS-PS1-12 PS1.A - Structure and Properties of Matter Planning and Carrying Out Investigations Structure and Function 71
HS HS-PS1-13 PS1.A - Structure and Properties of Matter Developing and Using Models Cause and Effect 57
HS HS-PS1-14 PS1.B - Chemical Reactions Using Mathematics and Computational Thinking Energy and Matter 69
HS HS-PS1-15 PS1.B - Chemical Reactions Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions Patterns 69
HS HS-PS1-16 PS1.C - Nuclear Processes Analyzing and Interpreting Data Stability and Change 74

Click to expand and explore the detailed standards, practices, and question counts we've tailored for comprehensive learning.

We further value the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) because they provide a comprehensive framework for science education that integrates core disciplinary ideas, science and engineering practices, and crosscutting concepts. By aligning our questions and exercises with NGSS, we ensure that students develop a deep understanding of scientific principles and are well-prepared for real-world applications and future academic challenges.

At our core, we reject the notion of a one-size-fits-all question template, acknowledging the diverse learning styles of students. Rather than chasing an elusive ideal question, we tackle the issue from another angle by steering clear of queries that are overly wordy, demand too much prior knowledge, make sudden leaps, or are mechanically answered without genuine thought. When a question requires pre-existing knowledge to even approach an answer, it's too heavy on the knowledge front for our taste. We lean towards starter questions that are accessible to novices willing to invest a modest effort—yes, we're aware we're setting the bar high with that expectation :D. If a question assumes understanding that hasn't been solidified, it's too much of a leap—akin to expecting a preschooler to read before mastering the sounds of the letters. The toughest nut to crack is crafting questions that can't be robotically answered without engaging with the core idea.

We like our questions to be cheat-resistant, challenging, and not too challenging. In summary, we aim for questions that are not easily outwitted by cheats and offer a good brain workout without tipping into frustration.

 

Q: Given the amazingly powerful search engines and AIs available today, how do you make your questions resistant to cheating?

A: We create bite-sized questions that require minimal effort to answer properly, reducing the temptation for students to cheat.


Q: What are your qualifications?

A: 100+ years combined experience in chemistry, stem, education, AI, and programming.  We work with scientists and engineers daily (and we see them using AI and programming daily too).  Learn more about our authors


Q: As educators, what are some of your most serious concerns about the education industry?

A: Too many schools wait 20+ years to learn, and teach, the latest scientific findings and technologies.