ChemKeyz aligns with the AP Chemistry Exam
AP Chemistry Exam Overview
The AP Chemistry exam is written by a non-profit organization called College Board. By taking the exam, students can earn college credit and demonstrate their readiness for advanced coursework in college.
ChemKeyz Concept Alignment
AP Chemistry Exam Concept Alignment
Concept | Subconcepts | Question count |
Scientific Method and Measurement |
Steps of the Scientific Method, Units of Measurement (SI Units), Accuracy vs. Precision, Significant Figures, Dimensional Analysis |
129 |
Atoms, Molecules, and Ions |
Structure of the Atom, Isotopes and Atomic Mass, Molecules and Molecular Compounds, Ions and Ionic Compounds, The Mole Concept |
125 |
Phases and Classification of Matter |
States of Matter, Phase Changes, Classification of Matter, Homogeneous vs. Heterogeneous Mixtures, Physical vs. Chemical Changes |
138 |
Physical and Chemical Properties |
Intensive vs. Extensive Properties, Physical Properties, Chemical Properties, Methods of Separation, Chemical vs. Physical Changes |
132 |
Atomic Theory and Structure |
Dalton’s Atomic Theory, Rutherford’s Gold Foil Experiment, Bohr Model of the Atom, Quantum Mechanical Model, Electron Configuration |
135 |
Periodic Table and Periodicity |
History of the Periodic Table, Periodic Law, Groups and Periods, Trends in Atomic Radius, Trends in Ionization Energy |
126 |
Chemical Bonding and Molecular Structure |
Ionic Bonding, Covalent Bonding, Metallic Bonding, Lewis Structures, VSEPR Theory |
125 |
Chemical Nomenclature and Formulas |
Naming Ionic Compounds, Naming Covalent Compounds, Naming Acids and Bases, Writing Chemical Formulas, Empirical and Molecular Formulas |
129 |
Chemical Reactions and Equations |
Types of Chemical Reactions, Balancing Chemical Equations, Stoichiometry, Limiting Reactants, Reaction Yield |
127 |
Gases and Gas Laws |
Properties of Gases, Boyle’s Law, Charles’s Law, Ideal Gas Law, Kinetic Molecular Theory |
127 |
Thermodynamics and Energy |
First Law of Thermodynamics, Enthalpy and Heat, Entropy and the Second Law of Thermodynamics, Gibbs Free Energy, Endothermic vs. Exothermic Reactions |
130 |
Acids, Bases, and pH |
Definitions of Acids and Bases, pH and pOH Scale, Strong vs. Weak Acids and Bases, Acid-Base Titration, Buffers and Their Function |
133 |
Curious about how well we align with the AP Chemistry Exam? Click to expand and see the detailed breakdown of concepts and question counts.
As of July 2024, roughly 1,560 of our 1,700 questions and exercises align to concepts challenged in the AP exam, as shown by the data table.
Bloom's Taxonomy Alignment
Bloom's Taxonomy | Question count |
Remembering | 285 |
Understanding | 379 |
Applying | 346 |
Analyzing | 355 |
Evaluating | 113 |
Creating | 78 |
Expand to discover the specific learning objectives our questions address within Bloom's Taxonomy framework.
We value Bloom’s Taxonomy because it provides a structured framework for developing and assessing students’ cognitive skills at various levels. By aligning questions and exercises with Bloom’s Taxonomy, educators can ensure a comprehensive approach to learning, ultimately preparing students for higher-level academic challenges.
NGSS Alignment
Level | Performance Expectation | Disciplinary Core Idea (DCI) | Science & Engineering Practice (SEP) | Crosscutting Concept (CCC) | Question count |
1,556 | |||||
MS | MS-PS1-1 | PS1.A - Structure and Properties of Matter | Developing and Using Models | Scale, Proportion, and Quantity | 60 |
MS | MS-PS1-2 | PS1.B - Chemical Reactions | Analyzing and Interpreting Data | Patterns | 73 |
MS | MS-PS1-3 | PS1.A - Structure and Properties of Matter | Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information | Structure and Function | 59 |
MS | MS-PS1-4 | PS1.A - Structure and Properties of Matter | Developing and Using Models | Cause and Effect | 75 |
MS | MS-PS1-5 | PS1.B - Chemical Reactions | Developing and Using Models | Energy and Matter | 74 |
MS | MS-PS1-6 | PS1.B - Chemical Reactions | Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions | Energy and Matter | 58 |
MS | MS-PS1-7 | PS1.A - Structure and Properties of Matter | Planning and Carrying Out Investigations | Structure and Function | 71 |
MS | MS-PS1-8 | PS1.B - Chemical Reactions | Using Mathematics and Computational Thinking | Patterns | 59 |
HS | HS-PS1-1 | PS1.A - Structure and Properties of Matter | Asking Questions and Defining Problems | Patterns | 62 |
HS | HS-PS1-2 | PS1.A - Structure and Properties of Matter | Using Mathematics and Computational Thinking | Patterns | 58 |
HS | HS-PS1-3 | PS1.A - Structure and Properties of Matter | Planning and Carrying Out Investigations | Scale, Proportion, and Quantity | 73 |
HS | HS-PS1-4 | PS1.B - Chemical Reactions | Developing and Using Models | Energy and Matter | 64 |
HS | HS-PS1-5 | PS1.B - Chemical Reactions | Developing and Using Models | Energy and Matter | 68 |
HS | HS-PS1-6 | PS1.C - Nuclear Processes | Developing and Using Models | Energy and Matter | 56 |
HS | HS-PS1-7 | PS1.C - Nuclear Processes | Using Mathematics and Computational Thinking | Energy and Matter | 56 |
HS | HS-PS1-8 | PS1.B - Chemical Reactions | Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information | Stability and Change | 58 |
HS | HS-PS1-9 | PS1.A - Structure and Properties of Matter | Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions | Scale, Proportion, and Quantity | 55 |
HS | HS-PS1-10 | PS1.B - Chemical Reactions | Analyzing and Interpreting Data | Patterns | 66 |
HS | HS-PS1-11 | PS1.C - Nuclear Processes | Asking Questions and Defining Problems | Energy and Matter | 71 |
HS | HS-PS1-12 | PS1.A - Structure and Properties of Matter | Planning and Carrying Out Investigations | Structure and Function | 71 |
HS | HS-PS1-13 | PS1.A - Structure and Properties of Matter | Developing and Using Models | Cause and Effect | 57 |
HS | HS-PS1-14 | PS1.B - Chemical Reactions | Using Mathematics and Computational Thinking | Energy and Matter | 69 |
HS | HS-PS1-15 | PS1.B - Chemical Reactions | Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions | Patterns | 69 |
HS | HS-PS1-16 | PS1.C - Nuclear Processes | Analyzing and Interpreting Data | Stability and Change | 74 |
Click to expand and explore the detailed standards, practices, and question counts we've tailored for comprehensive learning.
We further value the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) because they provide a comprehensive framework for science education that integrates core disciplinary ideas, science and engineering practices, and crosscutting concepts. By aligning our questions and exercises with NGSS, we ensure that students develop a deep understanding of scientific principles and are well-prepared for real-world applications and future academic challenges.
The ChemKeyz Approach
At our core, we reject the notion of a one-size-fits-all question template, acknowledging the diverse learning styles of students. Rather than chasing an elusive ideal question, we tackle the issue from another angle by steering clear of queries that are overly wordy, demand too much prior knowledge, make sudden leaps, or are mechanically answered without genuine thought. When a question requires pre-existing knowledge to even approach an answer, it's too heavy on the knowledge front for our taste. We lean towards starter questions that are accessible to novices willing to invest a modest effort—yes, we're aware we're setting the bar high with that expectation :D. If a question assumes understanding that hasn't been solidified, it's too much of a leap—akin to expecting a preschooler to read before mastering the sounds of the letters. The toughest nut to crack is crafting questions that can't be robotically answered without engaging with the core idea.
We like our questions to be cheat-resistant, challenging, and not too challenging. In summary, we aim for questions that are not easily outwitted by cheats and offer a good brain workout without tipping into frustration.
FAQs
Q: Given the amazingly powerful search engines and AIs available today, how do you make your questions resistant to cheating?
A: We create bite-sized questions that require minimal effort to answer properly, reducing the temptation for students to cheat.
Q: What are your qualifications?
A: 100+ years combined experience in chemistry, stem, education, AI, and programming. We work with scientists and engineers daily (and we see them using AI and programming daily too). Learn more about our authors.
Q: As educators, what are some of your most serious concerns about the education industry?
A: Too many schools wait 20+ years to learn, and teach, the latest scientific findings and technologies.